<\/p>\n
The third round of Afghan peace talks was held around two months ago in UAE. Negotiations were postponed due to disagreement on the agenda. Although the talks seemed to have reached a dead end, it instigated again recently.<\/span><\/p>\n The fourth round of the US-Taliban peace talks happened from 21st to 26th of January 2019. Although the talks were held behind closed doors and there were not enough details disseminated by the officials, hopes for lasting peace through policy have been ignited.<\/span><\/p>\n The recent meeting between the Taliban and the United States, the viewpoint of the Afghan government, and the direction towards which the peace talks are headed, are issues that are discussed here.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n What Happened During Six Days of The Talks?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Based on various media reports, the main discussed points in the meetings were the US army pullout timetable, prisoners exchange, ceasefire, interim government, facilitation of peace talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban, and stoppage of danger from Afghanistan to others after the US pullout.<\/span><\/p>\n Zalmay Khalilzad wrote on his Twitter \u201cAfter six days in Doha; meetings were more productive than they have been in the past. We made significant progress on vital issues but haven’t reached any final agreement\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n Khalilzad falsified all the reports about his discussion with the Taliban regarding the establishment of government and said, \u201cthe reports of interim government are false and was not discussed during the talks.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n After six days of talks, the Taliban, in a proclamation said \u201cat this stage of negotiations, progress was made in discussions regarding the US pullout and many other important issues. The clear view of the Taliban was: if the US pullout issue is not resolved, there is a chance of progress in other issues. The reports regarding ceasefire and agreement to negotiate with the Afghan government are absolutely untrue\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n Overall, the extension of talks till the sixth day, their stands after the discussions and various reports of media show that the Taliban and the US Representatives have discussed various issues. As Zalmay Khalilzad has said, the Taliban and the US have reached to agree on a general framework. This includes relative agreement on the US pullout, which was the main agenda of the fourth meeting.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Viewpoint of the Afghan Government<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The Afghan government was unhappy about the US-Taliban peace talks since the commencement of the process because of their omission from the negotiations. Therefore, by creating obstacles for the peace process, the government is trying to find and to have a central role in peace talks. The Afghan officials don’t approve any negotiations without their participation.<\/span><\/p>\n There were attempts to convince the Taliban to negotiate with the Afghan government during Abdu Dhabi meeting. However, the Taliban refused to negotiate with the government. Although the United States and Afghan government strived to pressurize the Taliban from a different direction to force them to negotiate with the government, the Taliban threatened to withdraw from the negotiations. After the threats and a short delay, the talks between the Taliban and the US initiated again.<\/span><\/p>\n The discussions of different media groups about the issue provoked the government officials and other political leaders. The Wall Street Journal, during the peace negotiations, stated: \u201cIn the negotiations, it was agreed that the Taliban would not allow Alqaida and ISIS to attack countries from Afghanistan.\u201d A few hours after the publication of the report, Ghani in World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, said: \u201cthe Taliban have links with the most dangerous criminals, mafia syndicates and Pakistan.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Similarly, after Khalilzad’s meeting with Ashraf Ghani, a US embassy newsletter quoted Ghani and stated: \u201cthe key to peace is in Kabul.\u201d This statement provoked Amrullah Saleh, the vice president of Ghani in upcoming elections and said: \u201cthe key to peace is not Kabul, but in Pakistan.\u201d He also said, \u201cJust like the 90s, the presidential palace should not be in the center of any changes, but should be in its surroundings and away from decision making\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n Ghani’s video message about the peace process was also a sort of disagreement with the Afghan peace negotiation process between the Taliban and the US. In his message, he said, \u201cWe want peace with deliberation, deliberation is important because we don’t want the mistakes of the past to be repeated and Afghanistan doesn’t become a field of civil war once again.\u201d He also had a bitter message to the Taliban and told them \u201cget out of the sinister plans of the foreigners, show your Afghan identity, say yes to the demands of Afghanistan and begin serious negotiations with the government.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Before this, President Ghani in Geneva conference said \u201cthe peace talks should be performed under the leadership of the Afghan government. The Afghan presidential elections in spring are important for the success of peace negotiations\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n Such statements indicate that elections are more important for the leaders of Unity government. President Ghani wants to remain president for the next five year, which only means the continuity of war for the next five years.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Towards Which Direction the Peace Talks are Headed?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Every peace process goes through many discussions and ups and downs. In order bring to bring peace through negotiations to a war country like Afghanistan, plenty of time, patience and discussions are needed.<\/span><\/p>\n The Afghan peace negotiations should be considered as complicated as the Afghan war itself. There are detrimental involved parties on a regional and international level in Afghan war which, for their good, do not want the war to end. Therefore, the involved sides in negotiations need to be patient and deliberate during the peace process.<\/span><\/p>\n Recently, the willingness of the Taliban and the US to reach a political arrangement, its beginning and continuity are issues that have increased hopes for peace.<\/span><\/p>\n The six days of talks and the proclamations of both sides were hopeful because both mentioned progress and continuity. Also, the submission of Qatar office\u2019s leadership to Mulla Baradar may be useful to the peace process and can persuade the Taliban to be more serious in the talks, since Mulla Baradar is one of the founders of the Taliban movement. He still has an important place as an influential and religious leader among the Taliban.<\/span><\/p>\n According to the Taliban, the main reason for the war in Afghanistan is the presence of the US forces. This is the main issue being discussed with the US, and it appears that the US is seriously considering the pullout.<\/span><\/p>\n Besides all these, there still obstacles on the way to peace. One of the barriers is the absence of a national consensus regarding peace which needs plenty of discussions for achieving it.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The third round of Afghan peace talks was held around two months ago in UAE. Negotiations were postponed due […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3427,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,4],"tags":[742,29,22,39,55,2],"class_list":["post-3426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-afghanistan","category-peace","tag-afghan-peace-process-six-days-of-talks-between-the-u-s-and-taliban","tag-peace","tag-slideshow","tag-taliban","tag-the-united-states","tag-ticker"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3426"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3426\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3428,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3426\/revisions\/3428"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3427"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}