\n
The first known direct talks between Afghan govt. and the Taliban in Islamabad have been welcomed internationally. These talks were taken place in Murree, a tourist spot near Islamabad. Where on the Taliban\u2019s side Abdul Latif Mansour (Nephew of Maulvi Nasrullah Mansoor), Haji Ibrahim (Maulavi Jalaluddin Haqqani\u2019s brother) and Mullah Abbas took part in it, while Hekmat Khalil Karzai (deputy foreign minister), Haji Din Muhammad (a member of High Peace Council), Faizullah Zaki, Asadullah Sadati, Aasim, and Muhammad Nateqee represented the Afghan government.<\/span><\/p>\n Moreover, the Chinese and USA representatives were too present as observers and UNAMA, White House, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Shareef, and the Afghan ex-President Hamid Karzai welcomed these talks.<\/span><\/p>\n These Peaceful talks happened due to Pakistan\u2019s initiative and the first round of it was in Urumqi, China. However, it is not the first time that the Afghan government is directly talking with Taliban but Islamabad\u2019s meeting differs with all those others meetings. But, still it is wondered whether Taliban\u2019s representatives truly represent them or not?<\/span><\/p>\n \n Islamabad\u2019s meeting and the Taliban\u2019s stance<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Even though the peaceful talks with the Taliban have been started during Hamid Karzai\u2019s era, but when Ashraf Ghani became the new afghan President, the peaceful talks becomes the core issue of afghan foreign policy. In Ashraf Ghani\u2019s first foreign visit, China becomes ready to give a platform to Taliban, Afghan government, Pakistan and China for peaceful talks.<\/span><\/p>\n In this regard, China hosted the representatives of Taliban\u2019s political office and later in February the Chinese foreign minister while visiting Pakistan said that China is ready for a mediating role in Afghanistan. In May, the peaceful talks between Taliban, Afghan government and the High Peace Council were started in Urumqi, China, which was later rejected by Taliban. In Urumqi, the representatives of Taliban were Mullah Abdul Jaleel, Muhammad Hassan Rahmani, and Mullah Abdul Razzaq.<\/span><\/p>\n After the first round of talks in Urumqi, hopes were high that the second round of peaceful talks will soon took place in Urumqi, \u00a0but when the Taliban rejected the Urumqi talks, as a consequence China halted to host peaceful talks in Urumqi, and then Pakistan\u2019s national security advisor Sartaj Aziz proposed to host this meeting in Islamabad. In this meeting, for the first time representatives of Taliban who were not the members of Taliban\u2019s political office but were part of Taliban took part in the direct talks with Afghan government.<\/span><\/p>\n Taliban also didn\u2019t reject Islamabad talks, but after taliban\u2019s declaration, it is understandable that Afghan government have talked with some officials members of Taliban but with one big difference that those who took part in Islamabad talks weren\u2019t a part of Taliban\u2019s political office.<\/span><\/p>\n According to the closed sources to Taliban, these peoples were influential in Taliban\u2019s hierarchy. But Taliban\u2019s political office spokesman Dr. Muhammad Naeem Wardak has rejected that no member of Taliban\u2019s political office has taken part in Islamabad\u2019s Peaceful talks. In addition, Taliban\u2019s spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid too said that it is the responsibility of political office to take part in such talking, not others.<\/span><\/p>\n \n The future prospects of Pak-Afghan ties<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n When Ashraf Ghani became President, Afghanistan\u2019s foreign policy towards Pakistan was completely changed, and Kabul\u2019s foreign policy became Pakistani centric. Even though, Afghan government hoped that Pakistan will play an important role in Afghanistan\u2019s peaceful reconciliation but as the time passed away Kabul became upset with Pakistan\u2019s double game and afghan government, especially the President, came under public pressure. Therefore, in this regard, the Afghan President wrote a letter to Pakistan and hence the signs of trust deficit incurred in Pak-Afghan ties.<\/span><\/p>\n The trust deficit reached to its heights when both Pakistan and Afghan security forces clashed over border in Paktika province, killing 8 pakistani and 1 afghan security personnel. As a result, both countries summons each other\u2019s ambassadors over this border firing and this revealed rift in bilateral relations. But, after this incident, Pakistan\u2019s help in bringing the Taliban to the negotiating table was admired and the Kabul once again looks through hopeful eyes to Pakistan.<\/span><\/p>\n The Peaceful talks between Taliban and Afghan government was solely responsible for removing trust deficit in bilateral Pak-Afghan tie and as a result the Afghan government admired Pakistan\u2019s role in hosting and organizing the Islamabad talks. The Afghan Ministry of Foreign affairs said in its press release: \u2018The National Unity Government thanks the leadership of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for facilitating the first meeting and hosting the delegation of the High Peace Council. It also hopes that this cooperation produce practical and tangible results so that both countries enjoy security and stability and both nations are rid of war\u2019[1]<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n \n Islamabad\u2019s facilitation role<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Taliban from the day first of its political office is saying that their political office has complete authority and capability to hold talks, But with this clear message, the afghan government didn\u2019t wants to hold talks directly with Taliban\u2019s Political office, instead it is holding peaceful talks with some of Taliban\u2019s former and present members with the help of Pakistani pressures.<\/span><\/p>\n Now the question arises, why the present Taliban wants to hold talks with Afghan government and the Islamic Emirate too didn\u2019t show any serious response to it. Its reason might be that they are holding talks mostly due to Pakistan\u2019s overt pressures. But, those who are closed to Taliban has expressed it clearly that only Taliban\u2019s political office has the right and authority to hold talks and others who do this is in their own personal capacity.<\/span><\/p>\n Both afghan and Pakistani government wants to divide Taliban through such talks, and since such talks, they are striving for this motive, But so far Taliban has been successful to preserve their unity. It is from here that Taliban in the last two press releases hadn\u2019t have criticized those who took part in talks and moreover they have shown themselves free of Pakistani pressures. Because, they had only contended that the sole authority to hold talks is with Taliban\u2019s political office.<\/span><\/p>\n \n Pakistani Pressure and the changing Taliban policy<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Since 2007, Pakistan have overt its pressures on Taliban. For instance, Taliban\u2019s two top leaders, Mullah Ubaidullah Akhund and Mullah Baradar, were arrested by Pakistani establishment, where Mullah Ubaidullah Akhund died under Pakistan\u2019s captivity and Mullah Baradar is still under house arrest. In addition, a much closed source to Taliban has told us that since 2007, roundabout 22 top Taliban leaders have been killed by Pakistani intelligence agency, ISI.<\/span><\/p>\n The reason behind all this is that Pakistan wants to control Taliban\u2019s foreign policy, but as Ashraf Ghani became President and changed Kabul\u2019s Pakistani policy, the pressures on Taliban got increased and due to these pressures some members of Taliban were forced to sit in Urumqi and Islamabad talks.<\/span><\/p>\n As a consequence to these Pakistani pressures, Taliban have changed their policy and now they have given responsibility of internal political and external affairs to Qatar\u2019s office (Taliban\u2019s political office). In this regard, Taliban have stated in its last statement :< on this basis, from now onwards all of Islamic Emirate\u2019s foreign and internal political affairs are entrusted to the Islamic Emirate\u2019s Political office as their sole responsibility. The Political office has full capacity and agency powers to conduct or postpone, in light of Islamic Principles and national interests, negotiations with internal and foreign parties wherever and whenever it deems suitable>[2]<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n It is understandable from the above statement that Taliban is going through serious period and Pakistan\u2019s Pressure is knowable. Therefore, it is from here that the Taliban in a counter attack have given the responsibility of internal political affairs to its political office, in order to get away Pakistani pressures.<\/span><\/p>\n \n The future of peaceful talks<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n When the afghan delegation returned home from Islamabad, they hold a press conference and called the Islamabad talks a productive discussion with Taliban and Haqqani members and moreover had called it a vital step towards achieving peace. According to Hekmat Khalil Karzai, Taliban have shared their wish list with them, which is the withdrawal of foreign forces, and the names of Taliban in UN and USA\u2019s blacklists. In this regard, they believed that Taliban\u2019s delegation cam with the permission of their leader, Mullah Mansoor, and had complete authority in the peaceful talks. Moreover, Afghan side is hopeful that the second round of these talks will be soon started after Ramadan.<\/span><\/p>\n However it is felt that Islamabad\u2019s peaceful talks would play vital role in the future peaceful talks, but as the taliban have given permission to hold talks only to its political office and holding peaceful talks, instead of Taliban\u2019s political office, with others will haven\u2019t a good future and it would most probably fail.<\/span><\/p>\n If there weren\u2019t any pressures from Pakistani side and the Taliban were too happy with such talks, then most probably Taliban might have took part in Islamabad\u2019s peaceful talks. However, not only the Taliban have rejected such talks \u2013Because political office is solely responsible for holding talks and no member of political office had taken part in these talks- but have given the internal political affairs responsibility too to Qatar\u2019s Taliban office. It is from here that we concludes that due to Pakistan\u2019s mediation the peace would not be a real one and the Taliban would too don\u2019t want to show itself as Pakistani stooge.<\/span><\/p>\n The End<\/span><\/p>\n [1]<\/a> To study more, see:< http:\/\/mfa.gov.af\/en\/news\/press-release-on-the-first-meeting-of-formal-peace-negotiations-between-official-delegations-of-the-high-peace-council-of-afghanistan-and-the-afghan-t<\/a>><\/span><\/p>\n [2]<\/a> For further studies, please visit:< http:\/\/alemara1.org\/?p=19802<\/a>><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The first known direct talks between Afghan govt. and the Taliban in Islamabad have been welcomed internationally. These talks were […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":307,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,4],"tags":[27,53,28,29,22,39,2],"class_list":["post-306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-afghanistan","category-peace","tag-afghanistan","tag-pak-afghan","tag-pakistan","tag-peace","tag-slideshow","tag-taliban","tag-ticker"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=306"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":308,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306\/revisions\/308"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/307"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}