{"id":297,"date":"2015-07-06T12:36:13","date_gmt":"2015-07-06T12:36:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/csrskabul.com\/en\/?p=297"},"modified":"2015-07-14T12:39:33","modified_gmt":"2015-07-14T12:39:33","slug":"afghan-pak-ties-a-new-phase-of-blame-game","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/?p=297","title":{"rendered":"Afghan-Pak ties: A new Phase of Blame-Game?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">Since the establishment of Pakistan in 1947, Afghan-Pak relations were not good in most of the times. In spite of having common religion, language and culture, the two countries had not have closed ties with each other.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">In 2001, when a new chapter in the history of Afghanistan was made, the then President Hamid Karzai endeavored in order to have good relations with Pakistan. Though, Karzai visited Pakistan 21 times when he was president, but the relations between two countries did not improve. In the last days in his office, Karzai explicitly said that Pakistan did not help his government. He repeatedly said that America and Pakistan hold the key to peace in Afghanistan. Even after his term was ended, Karzai remained an anti-Pakistani politician.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">When in 2014, a new government was established in Afghanistan; also some efforts were made, to reconstruct the relations of the two countries. Ashraf Ghani stated that his foreign policy has five circles, in which Pakistan enjoyed a vital place. Ashraf Ghani, unlike his predecessor, made efforts to have a better understanding with Pakistan. In his foreign policy, Ashraf Ghani declared that he would have good relations with Pakistan in terms of security and economics. He tried through economic integration to have historical relations with Pakistan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\"><strong>The Needs of Pakistani help<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">President Ashraf Ghani is a professional economist. When his government was formed, he stressed more on economic relations of Afghanistan and Pakistan, but in Pakistan there was no tangible change in policy. In APTTA agreement, Afghanistan accepted Tajikistan as a party to it; but Pakistan didn\u2019t accepts India upon Afghan request. Pakistan said, in order to be part of this agreement, India should normalize its ties with Pakistan. This condition seems impossible.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">Ashraf Ghani wants from Pakistan to help in bringing peace and security in Afghanistan. Like Karzai, Ghani expected Pakistan to have key of peace in Afghanistan and can oblige Taliban to commence peace talks with NUG. That is why he delayed weapons agreement with India, dispatch afghan soldiers to Pakistan for training, granted a free economic zone to Pakistan, in Afghanistan, also signed a controversial intelligence MoU with Pakistani ISI and did many other things for Pakistan. But still, there is no Positive reaction from Pakistan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">According to Ghani\u2019s government, they should have strategic vision regarding Pakistan, instead of tactical one. Therefore, they omit most of the dishonesties of Pakistan and follow the strategic vision. Regarding Pakistan\u2019s not fulfillment of its promises, Ashraf Ghani called his silence as strategic. NUG\u2019s new friendship with Pakistan, not only isolated Ashraf Ghani inside government, but also this is used by anti-Pakistan factions as a tool of pressure on Ghani.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">On the contrary, Pakistan gained more. In the last decade, Pakistan only this time can receive more privileges and could prevent Indian infiltration in Afghanistan. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\"><strong>From Intelligence Sharing to Blame-Game <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">As aforementioned, after all the concessions that were mad by president Ghani and privileges granted by him to Pakistan, still they did not present any tangible outcome, yet Ghani expect from them and that\u2019s why continues his \u201cstrategic silence\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">Recently, afghan government has criticized Pakistan. In June 21th Taliban targeted Afghan parliament; but Afghan secret services blamed Pakistani intelligence and said that a man of Pakistani intelligence, named Bilal has logistically helped in this attack.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">Pakistan\u2019s foreign ministry denied this blame. Keeping in mind the fact that this blame come in time, when Afghan government has signed MoU of intelligence sharing with Pakistani secret services. Last week, daily Weesa, disclosed the content of MOU. In a part of that MOU, it was agreed upon, that both countries would share intelligence. This discovery of daily Weesa was also a political pressure on Ghani.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">Both countries enjoyed better relation for a very short period of time. While MOU of intelligence sharing between two countries is already signed, yet blaming one party on such a harsh incident discloses that MOU has failed. It is also understood that Urumqi dialogues was a trick to receive more privileges for Pakistan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\"><strong>Lobbying or Mistrust?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">In Afghanistan, people still do not have confidence on Pakistan. This mistrust could not be uprooted through talks only; neither anti-Pakistan lobby is always behind this. Again both parties should be blamed for the emerging mistrust between them. Pakistan shouldn\u2019t have mad the promises that was not possible for them to fulfill it. On the other hand, NUG also did not understand the Taliban correctly, that\u2019s why they followed the way which was established by Hamid Karzai. Ashraf Ghani still believes that the key to peace is in Pakistan, that\u2019s why he rehabilitated its relations with Pakistan and granted them privileges.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">Recently, insecurity in Afghanistan and fictitious Urumqi meeting showed that Pakistan has an important role in Afghanistan\u2019s peace process as neighboring country, but they will never play the role of Taliban.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\"><strong>Conclusion <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\">The Afghan government urgently gave some privileges to Pakistan. Before testing Pakistan whether it can help to the peace process in Afghanistan or not. President Ghani, before everything tried to form good relations with Pakistan through one sided trust building measures.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\"><strong>Frist:<\/strong> Pakistan cannot have the influence over Taliban to the extent Ghani expected. The Urumqi meeting of China proves that Pakistan cannot force those Taliban to set in peace talks who really lead the war in Afghanistan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif;\"><strong>Second<\/strong>: If Pakistan can play a role, it is not sincere, then. For instance, India wants to be part of APTTA. Afghanistan can get benefit from India\u2019s coming. But Pakistan opposes this move. Pakistan did not performed its homework in response to the one sided measures of Afghan government. It looks like it is the end of honeymoon.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Since the establishment of Pakistan in 1947, Afghan-Pak relations were not good in most of the times. In spite of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":298,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,9],"tags":[27,30,28,22,2],"class_list":["post-297","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-afghanistan","category-foreign-policy","tag-afghanistan","tag-foreign-policy","tag-pakistan","tag-slideshow","tag-ticker"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=297"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":299,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297\/revisions\/299"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/298"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=297"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}