\n
The Turkish Parliamentary elections took place on June 7, 2015 in order to elect 550 members to the Grand National Assembly of Turkey. The Justice & Development Party, which is in short known as AK Party, won more seats of Parliament compared to any other contesters. Even though, the AK party has won the largest share of votes, but it has lost its majority in the Parliament. Therefore, AK party cannot single-handedly rule the country anymore; it needs the support of other parties to form a coalition government.<\/span><\/p>\n Now, the questions arise, what are the different future scenarios of govt. making in Turkey? Whether the AK Party and Erdogan has really failed and lost the elections? And what would be the regional impacts of next coalition government in Turkey?<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The Background of Islamism in Turkey <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n When the Umayyad dynasty was destroyed in Spain, the Ottoman Empire was on the rise in Turkey and until First World War, the Ottoman Empire was the last symbol of Islamic Caliphate which could include a large number of Muslims and their concerned territories. But, After the World War One and with the victory of allied powers, not only the Arabs, but most of the Muslims relinquished the empire. The center of Caliphate (Turkey) was replaced with Mustafa Kamal Ataturk\u2019s<\/em> secular autocratic government, which later-on becomes against the Islamic identity of the country. For instance, he changed the Ottoman Turkish alphabet from Arabic to Greek alphabet, Azan<\/em> was banned, and no one could wear a cap and so on and so forth.<\/span><\/p>\n After the World War II, under the leadership of Adnan Menderes<\/em> a movement emerged in Turkey whose goal was the revival of Islamic identity in the country. Therefore, he promised in 1950 elections that Azan<\/em> will be changed back in Arabic. He ruled Turkey from 1950 to 60, but in May 27 of 1960 his government was toppled down as a result of a military coup by the secular army and finally was executed in September 17 of the next year. The allegation against him was that he used \u201creligion\u201d as a tool in politics and according to an allegation, he once said that members of parliament could bring back Caliphate if they so desired.<\/span><\/p>\n The movement was banned with the execution of Adnan Menderes<\/em>. In 1969, Necmettin Erbakan<\/em> started another movement which faced different problems. His party had been banned thrice. But, In the Parliamentary elections of 1995, his party won the election and formed a coalition government. However, in 1997, his government was ousted by military coup and many members of the movement were imprisoned.<\/span><\/p>\n In the 1990s, Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan<\/em>, Abullah Gul<\/em> and most of the AK party members were in Erbakan<\/em>\u2019s party, but after the coup the differences emerged with Erbakan<\/em> and finally Erdo\u011fan<\/em> founded the Justice & Development Party in 2002. They took part in 2003 Parliamentary elections and after winning it, they formed government. They won in the 2007 and 2011 parliamentary elections. The main reason behind the consecutive successes was the party\u2019s economic achievement. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n AK Party: A Winner or Loser?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n After the June 7 Parliamentary elections\u2019 result announcement, the western media considered the AK party as a loser in elections, even though it has won more seats in the Parliament compared to other political parties. First of all calling the AK party as a \u201closer\u201d is not correct. It is only a western propaganda and the emergence of yellow journalism in the news outlets.<\/span><\/p>\n In addition, some media outlets even reflected these election results as that the Turkish people have rejected the policies of Mr. Erdo\u011fan<\/em>! It is not only a fanatic calculation but is also a very superficial analysis.<\/span><\/p>\n Though no one can deny that the AK party has less seats in this elections compared to its earlier elections, but it has its own reasons. According to some analysts one reason was the internal differences among the AK party leadership. Another reason was difference with Muhammed Fethullah\u00a0G\u00fclen<\/em>, a US-based-clergy who was previously an ally of Erdo\u011fan<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n If the Turkish people really rejected the so called \u201cDictatorial\u201d policies of Erdo\u011fan<\/em>, than why they chose him in presidential election. Moreover, if the nation really wanted to refuse the policies of AK party then why it gave more votes in Municipal elections. Even if we keep in view the recent elections, the AK party won more seats than other parties. These instances clearly depict that people still support the policies of President Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan<\/em>. That is why they are wining in great margins!<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The Future Scenarios of Govt. Making in Turkey: <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The Justice & Development Party has won 258 out of 550 seats of Turkish parliament. Even then according to constitution it cannot form a single-party government. A ruling party must have 276 votes of parliament to make a single-party government. In this regards, AK party needs only 18 votes of confidence.<\/span><\/p>\n \n There are seven possible scenarios of govt. making in Turkey, which are as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n Scenario 1: AK Party will make a minority government with the help of 18 votes;<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Scenario 2: CHP, MHP will form a minority government, but HDP must support it\u00a0\u00a0 ;<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Scenario 3: AK Party, MHP form a coalition government;<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Scenario 4: AK Party, CHP form a coalition government;<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Scenario 5: AK Party, HDP form a coalition government;<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Scenario 6: CHP, MHP, HDP form a coalition government;<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Scenario 7: Early elections.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n In aforesaid scenarios, the one which looks very possible is that the AK party will form a coalition government with any other party, but AK party will definitely compromise on some policies. Because, the two of the remaining parties cannot make a coalition government and a coalition of all the three political parties is not logically possible. At any case, AK party cannot be denied; it will form a govt. with the help of one political party.<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Changing Foreign Policy?<\/strong>!<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n It looks that the AK party will be influential part of a coalition government which will not affect the ongoing foreign policy of the country. Until the AK party rules Turkey, any fundamental change looks impossible in foreign policy of the country. The foreign policy priorities of Turkey will remain the same in Middle East as long as AK party is in rule. They will continue to ask free the ex-Egyptian President Mohammad Mursi<\/em> and the resignation of Bashr-Al-Asad <\/em>would be on the top of priority. But the AK party will not be as free as it was earlier.<\/span><\/p>\n \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The Turkish Parliamentary elections took place on June 7, 2015 in order to elect 550 members to the Grand National […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":272,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,10],"tags":[38,34,35,22,2,37,36],"class_list":["post-271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-islamic-world","category-region-world","tag-elections","tag-islamic-world","tag-region-world","tag-slideshow","tag-ticker","tag-turkey","tag-turkish"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=271"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":273,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271\/revisions\/273"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/272"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n\n
\n Party <\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n Won Seats <\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Justice & Development<\/span><\/td>\n 258<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Republican People’s Party (CHP)<\/span><\/td>\n 132<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Nationalist Movement Party (MHP)<\/span><\/td>\n 80<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP)<\/span><\/td>\n 80<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n