\n
Doctor \u201cSpenta\u201d\u00a0speeches in the parliament at the back of close doors have leaked out and raised plenty of stirred noise. Quoted from Dr \u201cSpenta\u201d that he said there is nothing in Afghanistan with name of peace process.<\/span><\/p>\n Wahid \u201cMojdeh\u201d states:\u00a0if Spenta was not the Presidential advisor of National Security, such a comment from him could be considered someone\u2019s personal opinion, but when a high ranking governmental official says such thing, would be ridiculous and if I say he has expressed his personal opinion.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Sediqi and Doctor Fatima \u201cAziz\u201d\u00a0members of parliament stated that supreme peace council is failure in its works and were demanding to remove this council soon.<\/span><\/p>\n According to Mojdeh\u00a0stuffs are usually engaged of working in government that they can say \u201cwe are in government not with a state\u201d. this is not surprising, If the lower level stuffs of government say the same, because several of them just get salary and is government, if the government gets lost and come another state it does not matter too much for them, but when a high ranking governmental advisor of a\u00a0State says that he is in government not with government, the issue is quite different\u00a0.\u00a0High ranking governmental officials have political dignity and when someone is with government, he is not allowed to express opponent point of view about sensitive governmental issues then say that this is my personal opinion, but it seems, that criteria differ in Afghanistan presidential palace\u00a0.\u00a0Dr\u00a0\u201cSpenta\u00a0\u201d\u00a0speech regarding peace process, also placed Supreme Peace Council in unfavorable position and for this reason Massoom \u201cStanekzai\u201d\u00a0claimed that Spentas verbal communication is misinterpreted, but the members of National Council says\u00a0 that these words are quite clear and are without ambiguity\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Mr. Zaker \u201cJalali\u201d aware of political affairs says about recent negotiation of Mr. Spenta:\u00a0since twelve years NATO forces are fighting with Taliban in Afghanistan. Taliban have stuck to the ground NATO forces in Afghanistan. Afghanistan war has caused, to face<\/span><\/p>\n these countries economic difficulties .US that lead war in Afghanistan, doesn\u2019t want to a head this erosion war. Public opinion in America is against war in Afghanistan. Most importantly, afghan people need peace. The reaction of Afghan people to opening of office for Taliban in Qatar was positive. Once again there was hope for peace; this status of\u00a0\u00a0 Mr. Spenta will not be accepted to foreign countries as well. America considers its own problems. Jobaiden Vice President of the United States, in December of 2011 obviously said, after this we won\u2019t inculcate Taliban as an enemy. These statements of Mr. \u201cBaiden\u201d were paving the way for opening of office in Qatar and convincing Taliban to dialogue and negotiations. Mr. \u201cSpenta\u201d is now in attempt to encourage Americans for resuming war, bleeding and causalities that he and the ruling team will extend their governance. This demand of Mr. \u201cSpenta\u201d cannot be anything else more than a desire for his survival.<\/span><\/p>\n From Mojdeh point of view,\u00a0until the matter ties to the context of Spenta talks, it should be said that he has brought proper words on his tongue. In the past twelve years there wasn\u2019t any peace process in Afghanistan and the government never had any program for peace. Government peace program was a demand of surrendering Taliban and sometimes they came with claims that we are in contact with the leaders of Taliban, but considering the condition we cannot name these leaders. When Mullah \u201cBarather\u201d imprisoned by Pakistan, the Afghan government has claimed, that Barather was in relation with us and arrested for this reason. Before the arrest of Mullah \u201cBerather\u201d, the same speech has heard about Mullah \u201cDudullah\u201d that he decided to gather peace process, but was killed. Why should only imprison and killed have been interested to negotiate with the Government of Afghanistan. Why when they were alive and free, did not show tendency for peace?<\/span><\/p>\n \n Ahmad Zia Rahimzai has said regarding this:<\/span><\/p>\n We have observed over recent years that each government organ and even high ranking governmental officials under the name of peace and compromise pursue their special goals and sometimes it has brought heavy losses in this regard and as well as to the relevant people, and the deathful attack on the Director of National Security Department is a great evidence for our claim.<\/span><\/p>\n This is unquestionable\u00a0,\u00a0that\u00a0Afghan government and its politicians during more than a decade if only listened to the demand of war-torn and oppressed people of the country regarding peace and compromise, real ways of compromise and the termination of war must be searched out. Today our country wouldn\u2019t be in this situation and our oppressed people were to live pleasantly in peaceful and calm atmosphere\u00a0.<\/span><\/p>\n Now Spenta as a senior advisor to the president and head of the National Security council admits that there is nothing with the name of peace process in Afghanistan and expose the privacy of ineffectiveness of incongruous organ of Supreme Peace Council, undoubtedly indicates, to whatever painful tragedy Afghanistan is faced, on one hand, during a long time the country\u2019s great amount of money has been spent on this failed Supreme Peace Council institution and on the other hand, feelings of peaceable and war-torn people of the country work manly have been taken to game, and through false hopes for peace either has whispered something in their ears.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n More surprising, all these domestic disclosures and unraveling mystery of each other secrets occurs, when armed Taliban has closed their political office in Qatar\u00a0,\u00a0in protest to the reaction of America and Afghanistan governmentwhich would have to be a good address for peace negotiations and the same any more weak hope that has come to existence in this regard, once again annihilated\u00a0. \u00a0Annihilation of expectations for peace\u00a0,\u00a0in case that the scope of war and armed attacks have reached to presidential palace and seat of the Black Organization in Kabul, in consideration to the transformation of a large part security responsibilities to unarmed and non-trained forces and this process goes forward to being completed, clarify\u00a0any more\u00a0the depth of this tragedy\u00a0.<\/span><\/p>\n Wahid \u201cMojdeh\u201d states:\u00a0doctor \u201cSpenta\u201d has said to parliament members all of the contacts with Taliban have the aspect of ethnic or personal Camaraderie. Namely, these contacts were in limit of <AsalamoAlaikom> which cannot be called peace process, If Doctor \u201cSpenta\u201d has said the these words,\u00a0 he said\u00a0 the correct words. These words can be founded such, that years efforts of Supreme Peace Council was to create trust between the Taliban and the supreme peace council as a result assassinated the head of Supreme Peace Council and yesterday one of a member of the Supreme Peace Council was targeted in Ghazni province and injured. Therefore, Supreme Peace Council doesn\u2019t have any effectiveness on negotiation with Taliban and is a formation of waste and consumption. Those who believe should eliminate this council, they have the right to.<\/span><\/p>\n Comments:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n doctor \u201cSpenta\u201d has said to parliament members all of the contacts with Taliban have the aspect of ethnic or personal Camaraderie.<\/span><\/p>\n \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Doctor \u201cSpenta\u201d\u00a0speeches in the parliament at the back of close doors have leaked out and raised plenty of stirred noise. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,4],"tags":[27,152,29,22,2],"class_list":["post-1106","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-afghanistan","category-peace","tag-afghanistan","tag-is-there-anything-under-the-name-of-peace-process","tag-peace","tag-slideshow","tag-ticker"],"views":8,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1106","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1106"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1106\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1108,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1106\/revisions\/1108"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1106"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1106"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csrsaf.org\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1106"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n\n
\n Waheed<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n 7\/14\/2013<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n